The Man is in the House
3 hours ago
1. so that we can learn more and remember more of what we learn.As to the second: We seem to take comfort in the feeling that if something was important enough to be worth our time to learn, it would or could have already been systematized so that we could learn it. This notion itself is (somewhat comically) circular. In other words, implicit in the probability that something worth knowing would already be systematized is the notion that even systematizing is systematized. And it is. But some systems are more accepted than other systems.
2. so that we can feel better about the stuff we don’t know.
1. Good, plastic clay with which to push myself to my limits.
2. Limits, the definitions of which grow broader regularly.
3. Glazes that are dependable enough to help me make a living, and unpredictable enough to keep me interested.
4. A mind young enough to see the possibilities in the accidents inherent in clay work, yet old and wise enough to know how not to needlessly repeat them. A mind evergreen.
5. An appreciative audience – critical by way of the avenue with which I’ve chosen to communicate with clay.
“Do this. Don’t do that. Can’t you read the sign?!” –Five Man Electric Band
”In the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell